首页 >> 网友热帖 >> 美国网友评论:中国可以在战争中打败美国吗?

美国网友评论:中国可以在战争中打败美国吗?

          来源:www.5619.cc | 2017-08-11 14:08:35 | 人气:46 次    

  quora网友:双方都不会赢。中国没有强大的海军力量来击败美国海军,到达美国本土。同样地,美国也没有能力在中国大陆的着登。使用常规武器,战事会陷入僵局;而事态上升到核武器,我们都清楚,那将是文明的末日,可能是地球上所有生命体的终结。

\

  来源:龙腾网 整理:五毛网 http://www.wumaow.com

  Can China defeat America in a war?

  中国可以在一场战争中打败美国吗?

  美国网友评论:

  ------------------------------------------

  Steve Collins studied at Lowell High School

  Answered Jul 21

  Sure if America was stupid enough to try and invade China.

  一定可以,如果美国傻傻地来侵略中国的话。

  ------------------------------------------

  They might just barely be able to Fight the US to a draw。。should hostilities resume in North Korea (presuming China joinedthe war on the NK side again this is by no means a foregoneconclusion that they would) or if the dispute over whether Taiwanwas an independent country or part of China turned into a shootingwar.

  如果朝鲜的敌对状态继续的话(假设中国加入战争帮助朝鲜,当然中国未必一定会帮助朝鲜),他们可能勉强能够与美国打个平局。如果争议是围绕台湾问题,那就会演变成一场热战了。

  ------------------------------------------

  If the fight took place anywhere else however China wouldloose and it wouldn’t even be close

  如果战争发生在其他地方,中国会输掉,而且会输的很惨。

  ------------------------------------------

  Bruce McKinney works at Self-Employment

  Answered Jul 21

  Depends:

  Nuclear war. Both lose but China loses more.

  核战,双方都会输,中国输的更惨。

  ------------------------------------------

  Naval war. US wins. But for what?

  海战,美国赢,但又能怎样?

  ------------------------------------------

  US invades China. US wins every battle but loses the war. SeeVietnam.

  美国入侵中国,美国每场战斗都可以赢,却会输了整场战争。看看越南就知道了。

  ------------------------------------------

  China invades US. China loses the naval war (see 2) beforethey ever get to US.

  中国入侵美国,中国在到美国之前就输了海战(见第二条)。

  ------------------------------------------

  Imperial war over foreign territory. US wins if it’s ashooting war. China wins if it’s non-shooting.

  就外国领土而进行的帝国之战,如果是热战,美国赢,如果不是热战,中国赢。

  ------------------------------------------

  Trade war. Not looking good long term for the US especiallywith current president.

  贸易战,不看好美国尤其是现在的总统。

  ------------------------------------------

  Cultural war. Not looking good long term for the US especiallywith current president.

  文化战,不看好美国尤其是现在的总统。

  ------------------------------------------

  Financial war. Both lose but US loses more.

  金融战,双方都会输,美国输的更惨。

  ------------------------------------------

  And so on.

  。。。。。。

  Andrew Bywaters I'm a pastor with a philosophy degree

  Answered Thu

  It depends on what they are fighting about. If the US wasdetermined at any cost to stop China’s current military build up inthe South China Sea or force them off the Diaoyu Islands or preventan invasion of Taiwan or set up shop and occupy North Korea…wellthere really isn’t much China can do about it except initiate asuicidal nuclear war. Any kind of war that’s actually conceivablebetween these two countries in the next 15–20 years ends very verybadly for China.

  它取决于为什么而战。如果美国决定不计代价去阻止现在中国在南海的军事建设,或者是强迫中国离开钓鱼岛,或者是阻止中国对台湾的入侵,或者占领朝鲜,中国对此也无能为力,除了发起一场自杀式核战争。在未来15-20年里,可以想到的任何形式的两国间的战争对中国都是非常非常非常不利的。

  ------------------------------------------

  If the US were insane enough to try to force regime changethrough an Iraq-war style invasion, it is inconceivable (and yes Iknow what that word means) that America could defeat China’s armydepose of the leadership of the PRC install its own people inBeijing and pacify the country. If those are the victory conditionsthen yes China can defeat America in a war.

  如果美国疯狂地试图通过一场伊拉克式的入侵战争来实现政权更迭,那么我们无法想象美国可以打败中国军队,废除中国领导层,在北京安插自己的人以及安抚全国。如果美国要实现以上这些才能取胜的话,那么是的,中国可以在一场战争中打败美国。

  ------------------------------------------

  Dan Pedersen former Engineer Program Manager BusinessArchitect at Boeing (1983-2008)

  upxed Aug 2

  Have you ever watched two grizzly bears fight. The fightcontinues until one grizzly gets tired and withdrawls. Neither bearis actually defeated because it is too much work and provideslittle benefit.

  你有看过两头灰熊打架么?战斗会一直持续,直到其中一头灰熊疲惫地撤退。没有一头熊会被真正意义上的打败,因为这需要的付出太多,而收益却很少。

  ------------------------------------------

  David Reyes

  upxed Jul 23

  Look up the term “pyrrhic” victory… I'll wait while you dothat.

  查一下什么叫“皮洛士式成功”.....  等你们。

  ------------------------------------------

  Okay now a war between China and the USA would end up in apyrrhic victory for both sides… and for the record a pyrrhicvictory is one in which the winning army loses most of its armydefeating its opposition. And as a result of This it would lose thenext battle and the war.

  中国和美国之间的战争对双方来说都是一场皮洛士式成功。据记录,皮洛士式成功是指在战争中,赢的一方军队损失惨重, 由此,它可能输掉下一场战斗、战争。

  ------------------------------------------

  The USA technologies outclasses China but China can field anarmy 3 or 4 times larger than all of our troops put together! Who’dwin this war? Neither China or The USA… BOTH countries would windup looking like Berlin at the end of WW2: A decimated country. Andboth sides know this so A war is not going to happen- Ever.

  美国技术远高于中国,但是中国的军队胜在人数,可能是我们能够集结的所有军队的三四倍之多。谁会赢得这场战争?既不是中国也不是美国,两个国家都会像二战结束时的柏林一样,最终被摧毁。而且中美双方都深知这个事实,所以永远不可能发生中美之战的。

  ------------------------------------------

  Mohd Asif LL.B from Uttaranchal University

  Answered Jul 21

  Alone china cant defeat US however both nation will bedestroyed by each other but china will suffer more.

  仅一个中国不能击败美国,但是中美两国都会被彼此摧毁,中国更惨。

  ------------------------------------------

  But if there's a war between China & US and both aresupported by different nations then obviously US will lose thereason is because China has a strong supporter like Russia N koreapakistan whereas US has enemy more than its allies and US can besupported by India Israel UK france whereas some of the enemynation of US from Arab will directly or indirectly support againstUS and they have a more wealth to expand in a war.

  但是如果中美之间爆发战争,而双方又有不同的支持者,那么显而易见,美国会输,因为中国有着强有力的支持者,比如说,俄国,朝鲜,巴基斯坦。而美国虽有印度、以色列、英法的支持,但美国的敌人超过了他的同盟,比如来自阿拉伯地区的敌对国家会或直接或间接地支持对抗美国的战争,而且大量财富可以使他们在战争中支撑下来。

  ------------------------------------------

  (台湾大学学生的回答)

  Chan Channz studied at National Taiwan University

  Answered Jul 31

  If war around China’s border yes.

  如果是在中国的周边打仗的话 那中国就可以赢.

  Else no US win definitely.

  否则的话中国就赢不了 一定是美国赢.

  ------------------------------------------

  (Our various skyeye/radar/laser/wave systems combined makestealth technology dull and can shoot satellites up to 30000 kmrange with many success for about a decade and just practised DN2recently. )

  ( 我们可以结合各种武器系统 诸如 天眼/雷达/激光/什么波? 来削弱对方隐身技术的作用我们在最近的十年里可以成功的把最高3万公里的上空的卫星打下来 而且最近DN2反卫星导弹就在试验中成功了一次 )

  ------------------------------------------

  If go nuclear probably everything reset.

  如果到了核战的地步 那一切都要重启了.

  China have been digging for many decades over 4000km inlength. Now at bunker v.2 for underground cities and factoriesincluding submarines.

  中国在几十年里已经挖掘了长达4000公里的地下设施. 如今在这些升级的地堡里有城市和工厂 还有潜艇

  Our best labs and weapons are developing and storeddeeply.

  我们最好的实验室都是在地下深处进行研究 最好的武器也都保存在地下.

  ------------------------------------------

  James Hutchinson Business Consultant

  Answered Jul 31

  These sort of questions are all over the internet why?

  这种问题互联网上到处都是,为什么?

  ------------------------------------------

  Let me spell out the obvious any war between powers like Chinaand America will almost certainly go nuclear and when that happenswe will reset to the stone age.

  我一定要强调下,像中美这样的大国之间发生战争几乎肯定是核战,那一切都会归零,回到石器时代。

  ------------------------------------------

  Once we developed nukes it was our que to start on eliminatingwar no one wins a war now not even greedy arms companies.

  一旦我们研制出了核武器,那着手消除战争是我们首要的问题了。因为现在没有人真的能赢得一场战争,即使是贪婪的武器公司也不行。

  ------------------------------------------

  The question we all need to be asking is how can we preventwar and focus our resources on something more useful than militaryspending.

  我们应该问的问题是,如何可以阻止战争,把资源集中在更有用的事情上而不是花在军费上。

  ------------------------------------------

  Think of it this way your life sucks because we waste hugeamounts of money on the military if we could all be adults andnegotiate international disputes then we could massively cutmilitary spending and redirect that money to raising the standardof living for everyone making war much less likely.

  你要这样想,因为浪费了巨额资金在军事上,所有你的生活糟透了,如果我们可以成熟地协商国际争议,就可以减少大额的军费,转而把这些钱用来提高生活水平上,战争就更不可能发生了。

  ------------------------------------------

  Dan Gall worked at Canadian Armed Forces (1972-1997)

  Answered Jul 21

  Neither could really win. China simply does not have the NavalStrength to defeat the US Navy and attack the United States.Likewise the US would not be able to support a landing in mainlandChina. It would be a stalemate using conventional weapons and if itprogressed to nuclear weapons then that would simply be the end ofcivilization as we know it and possibly the end of all life onearth.

  双方都不会赢。中国没有强大的海军力量来击败美国海军,到达美国本土。同样地,美国也没有能力在中国大陆的着登。使用常规武器,战事会陷入僵局;而事态上升到核武器,我们都清楚,那将是文明的末日,可能是地球上所有生命体的终结。

  ------------------------------------------

  Yf Yao

  Answered 3h ago

  US is the most powerful country on the earth there’s no reasonfor Chinese to be first one to pull the trigger unless the USstarted a war or helped Taiwan to get independency.

  美国是世界上最强有力的国家,中国人没理由先发动战争,除非美国挑起战争或者是帮助台湾独立。

  ------------------------------------------

  Even though Chinese-US casualty ratio was 7:1 US didn’t win inKorea peninsula when China just finished civil war and wasextremely poor and undeveloped that couldn’t even make mortar.

  尽管中美之间伤亡比率为7:1,中国也才刚刚结束内战,国内极为贫困和落后,甚至连迫击炮都没有的情况下,美国也没能赢得朝鲜半岛的那场战争。

  ------------------------------------------

  US government spent $757.8 billion on Iraqi war totaled over$1.1 trillion (from wiki). How much US wanna pay for a war withChina?

  美国政府在伊拉克战争中花费7578亿美元,据维基的数据显示,总费用高达1.1兆美元。那中美之战中,美国会花费多少呢?

  ------------------------------------------

  Both sides don’t like this price.

  双方都会付出极大代价。

  ------------------------------------------

  Dennis Cybulski former Life and Health Agent (Never Lost aClient)) (1969-1995)

  Answered Jul 21

  There would be a lot of factor involved in such a conflict andquite honestly depending on venue logistics and nuclear use or notthe variables are impossible to predict The Planning and Tacticspeople in the Pentagon have a full time job trying to determine howsuch a conflict would go where it would happen and what would bethe possible outcomes. Way over my pay grade.

  这样的战争会涉及很多因素 老实说 这取决于战地后勤和是否使用核武器都是无法预计的变数. 五角大楼里有人专门负责制定计划和战术来做出决定 这样的战争如何进行 在哪里进行 并预估战争有可能的结果. 这样的工作高于我的薪资水准.

  ------------------------------------------

  Robbie Jena Industrial Ecosystems and Strategy Architect

  Answered Jul 21

  Can China defeat America in a war?

  War to destroy their best customer…that is suicide…

  中国能否在一场战争中击败美国?

关于我们 - 广告服务 - 诚聘英才 - 网站地图 - 手机站 -
Copyright 2011 5619CC lnc. ALL Rights Reserved
闽ICP备14011241号-5